| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • Stop wasting time looking for files and revisions. Connect your Gmail, DriveDropbox, and Slack accounts and in less than 2 minutes, Dokkio will automatically organize all your file attachments. Learn more and claim your free account.

View
 

Material Culture

Page history last edited by pams 9 years, 9 months ago

here's the link that wasn't working during the session, but seems to be now:

http://grou.ps/digitalobjects

 

Arden's related links on delicious:

http://delicious.com/arkirkland/DigitalObjectsintheClassroom

 

we looked at:

 

http://fitstage.cit.cornell.edu/textiles/18c-19c/index.htm

specifically:

http://fitstage.cit.cornell.edu/textiles/18c-19c/1830_treman.html

(click on HIGH under 3D objects to open the QTVR that you can turn and zoom)

 

(need to fill in the link for the site Ethan shared)

 

http://imlsdcc.grainger.uiuc.edu/history/

 

attendees:

 

Arden Kirkland, Megan Brett, George Brett, Ethan Gruber, Steve Lubar, Susan Garfinkel, Teresa DeFlitch, Laurie Kahn, Kozaburo Hachimura, Etienne Posthumus, Dave Lester (he wishes!)

 

Arden's very rough notes: (attendees, please feel free to embellish!)

 

is there any digital material culture community?

if there's not a well-defined material culture community, period, why would there be a digital community?

maybe we need to start one?

 

varying approaches to material culture, similar to dilemmas of defining digital humanities -

     is it a method? is it a topic? seo services

 

traditional Material Culture scholars might not want objects to be digitized, as that could be seen as detracting from the physical properties of the object

 

(Arden's related note after the fact - I have an interest in how work with material culture fits with a kinesthetic learning style - handling an object has a different kind of impact than reading / listening / seeing. BUT can a digital surrogate of an object ever get close to this kinesthetic experience? for a student / viewer who has had even a brief encounter with an actual object, can the digital surrogate create a reminder of that kinesthetic experience, and therefore have a similar impact?)

 

Mellon $ for art museums / galleries - push for integrating art objects into other areas, especially educational curricula

 

dangers of digitization for its own sake

 

confusion of work vs. surrogate - common failure to distinguish between describing an object and describing an image of an object - in proper Dublin Core, should be one entry for object related to one entry for image, instead of one entry that tries to cover both (example of very fragile glassplate jpegs!)

 

perhaps a QTVR (as opposed to a still image) distinguishes better that it's representing an object, so less of that confusion?

 

can digital humanities rescue material culture from the clutches of museums?

 

influence of Antiques Roadshow on return to material culture study?

 

teaching people how to read objects

 

less funding for field trips, digital tour of a historic estate may be the closest students can get, popularity of traveling trunks to take into classroom

 

different levels:

     public

     scholars

     curators

 

center vs. spread - do we want to establish centers for digital exposure to material culture, or try to include material culture in a wide variety of other kinds of resources 

 

need to brainstorm ideas for scholarship of non-textual materials!!!

 

how to link objects to related text

 

combine imaging of 3D object, context of object in space (virtual room), documents related to object

 

breaking down boundaries of library/archive/museum

 

historic estates, historic societies by their nature have a holistic understanding of objects in context, other kinds of museums/libraries/archives have objects out of context

 

transparency of objects and relationships

 

if we're going to provide access for digital surrogates of material culture objects and expect scholars to do serious work with them, we need to consider:

url/uri/urn

persistent links

 

importance of commentary, can have levels of public or private

 

what about folksonomies?

consensus for tagging - individuals add their own tags, but then review each other's tags to evaluate their relevance

 

what about Second Life?

Second Life like AOL

need to have more virtual spaces outside of Second Life, to recreate historical context

     like Ethan's incredible model of the mosaic of Alexander the Great at the House of the Faun in Pompeii

     like Rome Reborn

 

again, who to go to for digital material culture?

 

can we start by continuing this discussion on the Digital Objects site (http://grou.ps/digitalobjects)?

if that site continues to have problems, I will move it over to a new host

also, the focus of that group is currently for teaching

do we need a broader group for digital material culture, with a sub-group for that focus on teaching?

 

 

this conversation really needs to continue!

 

 

 

 

If you're interested, but couldn't attend this session, please contact Arden or join the Digital Objects group to be a part of this continuing conversation. 

Comments (3)

mebrett said

at 7:33 pm on Jun 28, 2009

I've expanded on a thought which came out of this session on my blog - mebrett.wordpress.com

Smith said

at 2:39 am on Jan 18, 2011

Arts and Culture should be preserved. Thanks for posting this.

http://www.tangerinewebmasters.com/seo-marketing.html

You don't have permission to comment on this page.